Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Ohio App. 2d 190 - Darcy v. Bender

68 Ohio App. 2d 190 - Darcy v. Bender’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2019

5 state decisions

201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 87 Ohio App. 95 - Welge v. Welge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This case proceeded to trial on May 10, 2005. Plaintiff presented its evidence and rested on May 16, 2005. Defendant thereafter moved for directed verdict on all claims asserted by plaintiff pursuant to Rule 50 of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure. After construing the evidence presented most strongly in favor of the plaintiff, this court finds that reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion, and that conclusion is adverse to the plaintiff. Thus, defendant's motion for directed verdict is hereby granted and judgment is entered in favor of the defendant on all claims at plaintiff's costs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.