68 Ohio App. 2d 21 - State v. Papp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “done outwardly, without attempt at concealment, and performed pursuant to and manifesting a specific intent or design.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lytle · State v. Fitzgerald, Unpublished Decision (2-21-2007)

2. “(B) No person shall be convicted of conspiracy unless a substantial overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy is alleged and proved to have been done by the accused or a person with whom the accused conspired, subsequent to the accused's entrance into the conspiracy. For purposes of this section, an overt act is substantial when it is of a character that manifests a purpose on the part of the actor that the object of the conspiracy should be completed.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lytle · State v. Johnson, 90608 (1-22-2009)

3. “it is of a character that manifests a purpose on the part of the actor that the object of the conspiracy should be completed.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Fitzgerald, Unpublished Decision (2-21-2007) · State v. Friedlander, 90084 (6-9-2008)