68 Ohio App. 2d 211 - State v. Peterseim’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
685 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 685 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Xie (1992), 104 Ohio App. 3d 236 - State v. Fish (1995)
685 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Smith · Ristaino v. Ross · United States v. Barker · Kadwell v. United States · State v. Chaffin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 685 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]efore sentencing, the inconvenience to court and prosecution resulting from a change of plea is ordinarily slight as compared with the public interest in protecting the right of the accused to trial by jury. But if a plea of guilty could be retracted with ease after sentence, the accused might be encouraged to plead guilty to test the weight of potential punishment, and withdraw the plea if the sentence were unexpectedly severe. * * *”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]ne who enters a guilty plea has no right to withdraw it.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“[D]espite the more lenient standard applicable to [presentence] motions, an appellate court will only reverse a denial of leave to withdraw when the trial court has abused its discretion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.