Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Ohio App. 2d 247 - Rowe v. Bliss

68 Ohio App. 2d 247 - Rowe v. Bliss’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2005

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

60198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a result of that treatment, Mrs. Rowe has experienced numerous problems, and you may regard this letter as formal notice of a claim against you therefor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.