68 Ohio App. 2d 58 - Braverman v. Spriggs’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company v. Procter & Gamble Company (1991), Royal Electric Construction Corp. v. Ohio State University (1995)
6 federal appellate · 63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“running of interest ... is delayed only where the amount is unliquidated”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In cases other than those provided for in sections 1343.01 and 1343.02 of the Revised Code, when money becomes due and payable upon any bond, bill, note, or other instrument of writing, upon any book account, upon any settlement between parties, upon all verbal contracts entered into, and upon all judgments, decrees, and orders of any judicial tribunal for the payment of money arising out of tortious conduct or a contract or other transaction, the creditor is entitled to interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum, and no more, unless a written contract provides a different rate of interest in relation to the money that becomes due and payable, in which case the creditor is entitled to interest at the rate provided in that contract.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[W]here money becomes due under a contract, interest accrues from the time that the money due should have been paid .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.