Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Ohio App. 3d 174 - State v. Dumas

68 Ohio App. 3d 174 - State v. Dumas’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2016

15 state decisions

100199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Singer · State v. Lee · State v. McBreen · State v. Davis · State v. Cutcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where, as here, the record indicates that the appellant's [defendant's] attorney participated in the reassignment and in the waiving of appellant's rights to a speedy trial, after the time for trial had run, the court is of the opinion that the cases of State v. McRae (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 149 , 9 O.O.3d 118 , 378 N.E.2d 476 , and State v. Davis (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 444 , 75 O.O.2d 498 , 349 N.E.2d 315 , are controlling and require that the trial court's decision in overruling the appellant's motion to dismiss on grounds of failure to provide a speedy trial be found to be correct and should be upheld.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * the speedy trial provisions are not self-executing, but, rather, must be asserted by a defendant in a timely fashion to avoid such rights being waived. Partsch v. Haskins (1963), 175 Ohio St. 139 , 23 O.O.2d 419 , 191 N.E.2d 922 , * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Upon motion made at or prior to the commencement of trial, a person charged with an offense shall be discharged if he is not brought to trial within the time required by sections 2945.71 and 2945.72 of the Revised Code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.