68 Ohio App. 3d 385 - In Re Arney’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““(C) If, upon completion of the hearing, the court finds clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is a mentally retarded person subject to institutionalization by court order: “(1) The court may order the respondent, for a period not to exceed ninety days: “(a) To a public institution, provided that commitment of the respondent to the institution will not cause the institution to exceed its licensed capacity determined in accordance with section 5123.19 of the Revised Code and provided that such placement is indicated by the comprehensive evaluation report filed pursuant to section 5123.74 of the Revised Code. “(b) To a private institution; “(c) To a county mental retardation program; “(d) To receive private habilitation and care; “(e) To any other suitable facility, program, or to the care of any person consistent with the comprehensive evaluation, diagnosis, prognosis, and habilitation needs of the respondent. “(2) The court may order the respondent’s discharge. “(D) Any order made pursuant to division (C)(1)(b), (d), or (e) of this section shall be conditional upon the receipt by the court of consent of such facility or person to accept the respondent.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 92 Ohio App. 3d 299 - DeWeese v. Ohio Department of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities