68 Ohio App. 3d 455 - Andy Estates Development Corp. v. Bridal’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2020
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · 32 Ohio App. 2d 319 - Matson v. Marks · Hensley v. Henry · Nancy McKinnon Hinsdale v. The Farmers National Bank & Trust Company, Jane M. McKinnon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“*** for the limited purpose of reopening and setting aside the judgment of dismissal within the scope allowed by Rule 60(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Logsdon v. Nichols
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.