68 Ohio App. 3d 619 - Smith v. Minnick’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. · Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc. · Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa Hills · Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd. · 67 Ohio App. 3d 47 - Amborski v. City of Toledo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The reason for such necessity is that the protections afforded to political subdivisions and employees of political subdivisions by this act are urgently needed in order to ensure the continued orderly operation of local governments and the continued ability of local governments to provide public peace, health, and safety services to their residents. ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Except as provided in division (B) of this section, a political subdivision is not liable in damages in a civil action for injury, * * * or loss to persons or property allegedly caused by any act or omission of the political subdivision or an employee of the political subdivision in connection with a governmental or proprietary function."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.