68 Ohio App. 3d 630 - Moro v. Moro’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably In Re: Daniel Fordu, Debtor. Harold A. Corzin v. Julie A. Fordu (1999), 125 Ohio App. 3d 600 - Zeffe v. Zeefe (1998)
2 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · Kaechele v. Kaechele · Wolfe v. Wolfe · Hawley v. Ritley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In general, marital property is presumed to include all property acquired during the marriage or those assets produced or earned as a result of the parties' mutual efforts. This presumption may be overcome, however, by proof that the property was acquired before the marriage, or by gift, bequest, devise or descent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'a trial court's determination of valuation which is based upon competent, credible evidence absent a showing of an abuse of discretion.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smoyer v. Smoyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.