Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Ohio St. 362 - Vindicator Printing Co. v. State

68 Ohio St. 362 - Vindicator Printing Co. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2015

8 state decisions

20190319101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Manifestly it is the purpose of this statute to reimburse-the treasury for unauthorized payments from it not otherwise provided for. It is in one sense a' remedial statute, and yet it gives a right of action which before its enactment did not exist, and could not, we think, apply to past transactions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.