Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Okla. 178 - Weer v. Bell

Weer v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 1952
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1952

6 state decisions

2019181920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dwyer v. Nolan · Lewis v. President of the Bank of Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * All the authorities agree that in any case where a judgment, valid on the face of the record, is assailed, before the court in a separate action would have jurisdiction to vacate and set the same aside, all the parties to the judgment so assailed must be made parties to the action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.