Barnard v. Bilby’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 1979 · most notably Sandlin v. Barker (1923), Cowokochee v. Chapman (1922)
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schock v. Fish · Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of Bartlesville · Hathaway v. Hoffman · Eaves v. Mullen · Baker v. Cureton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That allotted lands shall not be subjected or held liable to any form of personal claim, or demand, against the allottees arising or existing prior to the removal of restrictions, other than contracts heretofore expressly permitted by law””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sandlin v. Barker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.