Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Or. App. 124 - Contractors, Inc. v. Form-Eze Systems, Inc.

68 Or. App. 124 - Contractors, Inc. v. Form-Eze Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2011

2 district · 6 state decisions

301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he trial court has broad discretion in determining when justice requires amendment to a complaint, and its decision will not be disturbed unless it is shown that the court exceeded the bounds of its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “leave [to amend] shall be freely given when justice so requires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.