68 Or. App. 817 - State v. Hull’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f defendant makes restitution for the loss covered by the civil judgment, 'the court shall credit any restitution paid by the defendant to a victim against any judgment in favor of the victim in such civil action.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“argue[d] that [an] order to pay restitution * * * [was] improper, because the [victim] ha[d] obtained a civil judgment against him for its losses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[r]estitution is not a form of civil recovery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.