Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 P3D 1286 - Porterfield v. State

Porterfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Idaho v. Wright · Lilly v. Virginia · Williamson v. United States · State v. Schiappa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In [the] first conversation [ie., the un-taped conversation in which Michele Port-erfield first informed Knight that she and Porterfield had killed a man,] and in the following taped conversations, there was no apparent reason for [Michele] Porter-field to fabricate her admissions.... Even though [Michele] Porterfield's account implicated [her husband Todd] Porterfield in the arson and murder, Judge Pengilly found that there was no indication that Mrs. Porterfield minimized her own role or tried to shift blame to Porterfield. Mrs. Porterfield had no reason to believe that her statements to Knight would curry any favor with the police or the State becausel, as] Judge Pengilly found{,] she had no reason to anticipate [that her] statements would be relayed to law enforcement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.