Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 SO2D 577 - Sentco, Inc. v. McCulloh

Sentco, Inc. v. McCulloh’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 1985

6 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

501953196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co. · The Children's Bootery v. Sutker · 67 So. 2d 215 - Florida Ventilated Awning Co. v. Dickson · Wesson v. Galef · El Modello Cigar Manufacturing Co. v. Gato

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There appears to me not the slightest question that all the infringing revolvers were deliberately made for the purpose of imitating a model of the plaintiff”. In the case of Galef and Newmark, they correspond in dimension even by gauge, a coincidence wholly impossible in the absence of conscious imitation. In the case of Gluck, the visual similarity is as complete. Such things do not happen because manufacturers are merely following old patents. Little identical features in the two lay the matter beyond doubt, if doubt could remain, (emphasis added) 68 So. at 580.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The defendant . . . may copy the plaintiff’s goods slavishly down to the minutest detail; but he may not represent himself as the plaintiff in their sale.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.