Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 SO3D 259 - Bishop v. Sheldon

Bishop v. Sheldon’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Heggs v. State · 622 So. 2d 941 - Tripp v. State · Larimore v. State · 831 So. 2d 172 - State v. Atkinson · 872 So. 2d 217 - Murray v. Regier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in State v. Atkinson, 831 So.2d 172, 174 (Fla. 2002), in which it held that the Act was not applicable to individuals who were not in lawful custody on its effective date. Larimore, 2 So.3d at 115 . The court explained that interpreting the Jimmy Ryce Act as not requiring lawful custody for individuals who had been incarcerated at some point after the effective date of the Act but are not in lawful custody when commitment proceedings are initiated would be contrary not only to the overall intent of the Act but”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.