68 So. 3d 330 - State v. Herron’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania v. Mimms · 819 So. 2d 123 - State v. Goldberg · 599 So. 2d 703 - Richardson v. State · 849 So. 2d 1222 - Ray v. State · D.N. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the pat-down was lawful because Herron appeared “excruciatingly] nervous, fidgety,” could not produce a driver’s license, proof of insurance, or car registration, and appeared to be “looking out the window [for] an avenue of escape.” The State further point[ed] out that the officer did not feel comfortable returning to his vehicle to run a DAVID System identification or mug shot system identification of the defendant under the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.