Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

68 So. 3d 365

Fipps v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 23, 2011

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-08-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2011

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-08-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for burglary of a dwelling. We find the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. The State failed to provide sufficient evidence identifying appellant as the second perpetrator of the burglary. Therefore, we reverse and remand with instructions that appellant be discharged.

¶2REVERSED AND REMANDED, with instructions.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
/68/so3d/365 · .json · Public domain