Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 SW3D 102 - Williams v. Vought

Williams v. Vought’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 14th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 633 (§ 14 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Monge v. California · Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co. · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth · Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Havner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who has initiated an action in a court of competent jurisdiction or who has an action pending before an administrative agency under other law or an order or ordinance of a political subdivision of this state based on an act that would be an unlawful employment practice under this chapter may not file a complaint under this subchapter for the same grievance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.