Wright v. Ellison’s Empirical Analysis
68 U.S. 16 · 1863
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 11 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1991 · most notably Hobbs v. McLean (1886), Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service Commission (1938)
26 federal appellate · 11 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To constitute an equitable lien on a fund there must be some distinct appropriation of the fund by the debtor. It is not enough that the fund may have been created through the efforts and outlays of the party claiming the lien.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““That whenever a court of law is competent to take cognizance of a rig'lit and has power to proceed to a judgment which affords a plain, adequate.', and complete remedy without the aid of a court of equity, the plaintiff must proceed at law, because the defendant has a constitutional right to a trial by jury.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“‘.‘The rules of equity are as fixed as those of law, and this court can no more depart from the former than the latter. Unless the complainant has shown a right to relief in equity, however clear his rights at law, he can have no redress in this proceeding.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Goff v. Kelly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.