Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 U.S. 330 - Jones v. Green

Jones v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

68 U.S. 330 · 1863

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2008 · most notably Greenlaw v. United States (2008), Straton v. New (1931)

12 federal appellate · 25 state decisions — followed in 16 states

290186318701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seybert v. City of Pittsburg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A court of equity exercises its jurisdiction in favor of a judgment creditor only when the remedy afforded him at law is ineffectual to reach the property of the debtor, or the enforcement of a legal remedy is obstructed by some incumbrance upon the debtor’s property, or some fraudulent transfer of it.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “‘‘A court of equity exercises its jurisdiction in favor of a judgment creditor: only when tbe remedy afforded him at law is ineffectual to reach the property of .the debtor, or the enforcement of the legal remedy is obstructed by some incumbrance upon the debtor’s property, or some fraudulent transfer of it. * * * In the- second case the equitable relief sought rests upon the fact that the execution has issued and a specific lien has been acquired upon the property of the debtor by its levy, but that the obstruction interposed prevente a sale of the property at a fair valuation. It is to remove the obstruction, and thus enable the creditor to obtain a full price for the property, that the suit is brought.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The execution shows that the remedy afforded at law has been pursued, and is, of course, the highest evidence of the fact. The return shows whether the remedy has proved effectual or, not, and, from the embarrassments which would attend any other nile, the return is held conclusive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.