Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 U.S. 5 - Cross v. De Valle

Cross v. De Valle’s Empirical Analysis

68 U.S. 5 · 1863

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 7 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1985 · most notably Willing v. Chicago Auditorium Ass'n (1928), Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co. v. Texas Central Railway Co. (1890)

13 federal appellate · 7 district · 19 state decisions — followed in 12 states

1401863187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That a cross-bill is a mere, auxiliary suit, and a dependency of the original. It may be brought by a defendant against the plaintiff in the said suit, or against other defendants, or against both; but it must be touching the matters in question in the bill.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““That an alien may take by deed or devise, and hold against any one but the sovereign until office found, is a familiar principle of law, which it requires no citation of authorities to establish. Nor is it affected by the fact that a statute of Rhode Island will permit aliens to take a license to purchase, which will protect them even as against the state; nor by the fact that a chancellor may not entertain a bill by an alien to enforce a trust, which, if conveyed to him, might immediately escheat to the crown.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““A cross-bill is brought * * *, or to obtain complete relief to all the parties as to the matters charged in tho original bill. It should not introduce any distinct matter. It is the auxiliary to the original suit, and a graft and dependency upon it. If its purpose be different from this, it is not a cross-bill, though it may have a connection with the same general subject.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.