Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 WASH 7 - State v. Holmes

State v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 1986
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1986

6 state decisions

2019121920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sparf v. United States · Jay Delamater v. State of South Dakota · State v. J. P. Bass Publishing Co. · Rose v. State · Zinn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No person informed against or indicted for a crime shall be convicted thereof, unless by admitting the truth of the charge in his plea, by confession in open court, or by the verdict of a jury, accepted and recorded by the court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.