68 Wash. 2d 374 - Owen v. Matz’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 54 Wash. 2d 570 - Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc. · 44 Wash. 2d 667 - Bowman v. Webster · 31 Wash. 2d 157 - Kessinger v. Anderson · Bonded Adjustment Co. v. Anderson · Keylon v. Inch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when a party claiming to have been defrauded, enters after discovery of the fraud into new arrangements or engagements concerning the subject matter of the contract claimed to have been procured by fraud ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.