68 Wash. App. 309 - State v. Estabrook’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2021
3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Kentucky v. Stincer · Flanagan v. United States · United States v. MacDonald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“He prepared the questions asked of J.H. He had the opportunity to ask follow-up questions. Furthermore, the judge was persistent in asking Estabrook's questions, rephrasing questions and obtaining answers when J.H. initially did not understand certain questions. Secondly, the procedure followed did not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“destroy the jury's perception that [Estabrook was] representing himself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“actual control over the case he [chose] to present to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.