Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Wash. App. 69 - Robblee v. Robblee

68 Wash. App. 69 - Robblee v. Robblee’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
8
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably Balsamides v. Protameen Chemicals, Inc. (1999), Landstrom v. Shaver (1997)

42 state decisions

270199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 90 Wash. 2d 384 - Holland v. Boeing Company · Hansen v. Covell · 45 Wash. 2d 158 - Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co. · Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, Inc. · Cavalier Oil Corp. v. Harnett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`burdensome, harsh and wrongful conduct; a lack of probity and fair dealing in the affairs of a company to the prejudice of some of its members; or a visible departure from the standards of fair dealing, and a violation of fair play on which every shareholder who entrusts his money to a company is entitled to rely.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Reasonable expectations' are those spoken and unspoken understandings on which the founders of a venture rely when commencing the venture.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “test, defines oppression as a violation by the majority of the reasonable expectations of the minority. Robblee, 68 Wash.App. at 76 , 841 P.2d 1289 (citing Gimpel v. Bolstein, 125 Misc.2d 45 , 477 N.Y.S.2d 1014 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. 1984)).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.