68 Wash. App. 878 - State v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Disbarment of Kleindienst · Hill v. Lockhart · State v. Hoffman · 120 Wash. 2d 156 - State v. Coria · 91 Wash. 2d 342 - State v. Boyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“RCW 69.50.401(a) describes a general drug offense, possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. RCW 69.50.435 describes a special drug offense, possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver in a particular place or area. The special drug offense requires proof of an additional element. Both the general and special drug offenses must be charged and proved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]ith knowledge that it will promote or facilitate the commission of the crime,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carter“[t]he liability of the accomplice is the same as that of the principal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.