Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Wis. 2d 662 - State v. Hughes

68 Wis. 2d 662 - State v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
5
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2010

19 state decisions

15019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haywood v. United States · Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co. · 40 Wis. 2d 223 - State Ex Rel. Evanow v. Seraphim · 30 Wis. 2d 39 - State Ex Rel. La Follette v. Raskin · 28 Wis. 2d 590 - State Ex Rel. White v. Simpson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ARREST WITHOUT A 'WARRANT. The arrest of a person may be lawfully made also by an officer or a private citizen without a warrant upon reasonable information that the accused stands charged in the courts of another state with a crime punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year; but when so arrested the accused must be taken before a judge with all practicable speed and complaint must be made against him under oath setting forth the ground for the arrest as in sub. (13); and thereafter his answer shall be heard as if he had been arrested on a warrant.” (Emphasis supplied.) Sec. 976.03 (14), Stats.; sec. 629.14,1971 Minn. Stats.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.