Geyer v. Tuck’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1980
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miskimmins v. Shaver · Roberts v. Webster · Ex Parte Sullivan · 2 Cal. App. 726 - Ex Parte White · McFarland v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * ‘To allow appeals by the respondent from the judgment of the court discharging the applicant, would defeat the purpose of the writ as a speedy and prompt relief against illegal detention. * * * Geyer v. Tuck, supra, 229 P.2d at 925 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.