Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 F.2d 1062 - Maceluch v. Wysong

Maceluch v. Wysong’s Empirical Analysis

680 F.2d 1062 · 1982

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2018

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

1501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. · Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Despite the fact that medicine is practiced within an objective scientific framework, the decisional processes of a physician reflect not only the aggregate of a substantive knowledge of clinical tech ñiques, but also his judgments as to the need for, and nature of, treatment. That skill, born of experience, perception of human nature, and intuitions as to what is best for a patient, jumps over the many voids in “scientific” knowledge and separates the scientist from the doctor. It follows that two schools of medicine that advocate differing approaches, even if they differ only in their advocacy of differing philosophical approaches to the same scientific realities, present a difference that a legislature may note without unlawfully discriminating against one, or preferring one over the other. In sum, the state has demonstrated a rational relationship between its licensing categories and debatable, if not real, differences between doctors possessing M.D. and D.O. degrees. That is all that the Constitution requires.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t is already exceedingly difficult for a layman to make an intelligent choice of physicians. To allow physicians trained in osteopathic schools to use the designation, “M.D.” would deprive a layman of one of the only methods available of differentiating between physicians. Osteopathic physicians have a unique contribution to make and offer the public a distinct option in health care.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “after their names on their letterheads and on other public listings of diverse nature, although osteopaths contended designation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.