Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 F.2d 1271 - Bunch v. United States

Bunch v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

680 F.2d 1271 · 1982

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
5
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc. (1988), Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri Products (1997)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

21019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 633 (§ 14 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on Wood v. Strickland · Rozier v. Ford Motor Co. · Cancellier v. Federated Department Stores · Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc. · Scott & Fetzer Co. v. Dile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fraud ..., misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “left to the sound discretion of the trial judge,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[u]nder [FRCP] Rule 60(b)(3), the movant must[ ] (1) prove by clear and convincing evidence that the verdict was obtained through fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct, [and] (2) establish that the conduct complained of prevented the losing party from fully and fairly presenting his case or defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.