New Orleans Steamship Ass'n v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s Empirical Analysis
680 F.2d 23 · 1982
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2011 · most notably Donovan v. Cunningham (1983), Secretary of Labor v. Fitzsimmons (1986)
20 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Cromwell v. County of Sac · United States v. Morton Salt Co. · Oklahoma Press Pub Co v. Walling US News Printing Co · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“EEOC may challenge a transaction which was the subject of prior judicial scrutiny in a private suit, if the subsequent challenge seeks different relief”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the E.E.O.C. may not bring a second suit based on the transactions that were the subject of a prior suit by a private plaintiff, unless the E.E.O.C. seeks relief different from that sought by the individual.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Cross-Appellee v. Kenneth R. Cunningham, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, L.J. Carter and Mark W. Perrin, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, Salvador Esparza and Edward F. Fritcher, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Wilford H. Hairell and A. Mitchell Robertson, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants- Cross-Appellees v. Allied Bank of Texas, Third Party Defendant-Cross-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Metropolitan Contract Services, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Cross-Appellee · Donovan v. Cunningham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.