United States v. O'Boyle’s Empirical Analysis
680 F.2d 34 · 1982
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2018
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc. · United States v. Beecroft · United States v. Allen · United States v. Collon · Blakeslee v. Wallace
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there was evidence from which a jury might reasonably find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] false or fraudulent representation, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 , may be made by statements of half truths or the concealment of material facts, as well as by affirmative statements or acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.