Jacobs v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
680 F.2d 88 · 1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2016
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 101 (Acquisition Improvement and Accountability Act of 2007) · 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 8682 · 10 U.S.C. § 971 · 14 U.S.C. § 291 · 14 U.S.C. § 461
Relies on Cass v. United States · United States v. Noce · Linfors v. United States · Williams v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“full-time duty in the active, military service of the United States. Such term includes full-time training duty, annual training duty, and attendance, while in the active military service, at a school designated as a service school_” The identical expression”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“this preposterous practice ... of counting the period of cadet service in computing length of service ... is as indefensible as it is illogical and unfair....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Horner v. Jeffrey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.