Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 F.2d 979 - Scott v. Moore

Scott v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

680 F.2d 979 · 1982

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2010
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2010 · most notably United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. Scott (1983), Keating v. Carey (1983)

21 federal appellate · 8 district ·

4501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 29 U.S.C. § 102 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 104 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 105 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 106 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 107 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 113 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Griffin v. Breckenridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The language requiring intent to deprive of equal protection, or equal privileges and immunities, means that there must be some racial, or perhaps otherwise class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus behind the conspirators’ action. The conspiracy, in other words, must aim at a deprivation of the equal enjoyment of rights secured by the law to all.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Congress believed that the victims of this violence were carpetbaggers or “men of Union sentiment,” in a word, Republicans. “The dead and the wounded, the maimed and the scourged, are all, all Republicans.” Id. at 426, col. 3 (remarks of Congressman McKee). “[E]very victim of Ku Klux outrage has been a Republican.” Id. at 437, col. 2 (remarks of Congressman Cobb). The Klan’s object is “the defeat of Republicanism.” Id. at app. 196, col. 2 (remarks of Congressman Snyder). The Klan’s “systematic plan ... is not to leave in any of those States a brave white man who dares to be a Republican or a colored man who dares to be a voter.” Id. at 702, col. 1 (remarks of Senator Edmunds). The Klan’s “purpose is by these innumerable and nameless crimes to drive those who are supporting the Republican Party to abandon their political faith or to flee from the state”____ Id. at app. 252, col. 1 (remarks of Senator Morton). Finally, those “who vote with the party ... or who accept a petty office from a Republican Administration, are in much of the country continually in imminent peril for •their lives.” Id. at 654, col. 1 (remarks of Senator Osborn).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.