Zinna v. Congrove’s Empirical Analysis
680 F.3d 1236 · 2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Kentucky v. Graham · Farrar v. Hobby · New York Times Company v. United States · Minneapolis Star and Tribune Company v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'to account for the particularities of the suit and its outcome.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Ross v. Jenkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.