Johnson v. Killian’s Empirical Analysis
680 F.3d 234 · 2012
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1997E · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Jones v. Bock · Woodford v. Ngo · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“required to resolve all ambiguities and draw all permissible factual inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ummary judgment is appropriate [only] where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the [non-movant].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.