Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 F.3d 61 - Certain Interested Underwriters v. Stolberg

Certain Interested Underwriters v. Stolberg’s Empirical Analysis

680 F.3d 61 · 2012

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 19 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Medina-Munoz v. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Company · Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc. · Blackie v. Maine · Cody v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once the moving party alleges the absence of all meaningful factual disputes, the non-moving party must show that a genuine issue of material fact exists. This showing requires more than the frenzied brandishing of a cardboard sword. The non-moving party must point to facts memorialized by materials of evidentiary quality and reasonable inferences therefrom to forestall the entry of summary judgment.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] policy provision will not be deemed ambiguous simply because the parties quibble over its meaning. Rather, a policy provision is ambiguous only if it is susceptible of more than one meaning and reasonably intelligent persons would differ as to which meaning is the proper one.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A]mbiguity -- unlike beauty -- does not lie wholly in the eye of the beholder. . . . A policy provision will not be deemed ambiguous simply because the parties quibble over its meaning.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.