Sarmiento v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
680 F.3d 799 · 2012
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Wisconsin Western District Court)
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (§ 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Kaur v. Board of Immigration Appeals · Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Toufighi v. Mukasey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.