Troester v. Starbucks Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. · 22 Cal. 4th 575 - Morillion v. Royal Packing Co. · 14 Cal. 4th 557 - Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. Bradshaw · 20 Cal. 4th 785 - Ramirez v. Yosemite Water Company · 49 Cal. 4th 35 - Martinez v. Combs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he federal de minimis rule could be seen as less employee-protective than California's wage and hour laws and, therefore, at odds with those laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“either dispose of the appeal or determine how the case might proceed were we to remand this putative class action to the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the California Supreme Court has not addressed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.