Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 FAPPX 977 - Smartflash LLC v. Apple Inc.

Smartflash LLC v. Apple Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 2020
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 101

Relies on Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l · Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. · Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership · Bilski v. Kappos · Bilski v. Kappos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “writing data to implement an abstract idea on a computer does not transform the nature of the claim into a patent-eligible application”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “invoke computers merely as tools to execute fundamental economic practices, in particular retrieving and providing data subject to payment validation and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the asserted claims are directed to the abstract idea of conditioning and controlling access to data based on payment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.