Ius v. Butcher’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · United States v. Turkette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. the relative ease of access to sources of proof; 2. the amenability of unwilling witnesses to service of process; 3. the cost of attendance at trial of willing witnesses; 4. the relation of the community in which the courts and jurors are .required to serve to the occurrence at issue in the litigation; 5. the accessibility of premises involved in the litigation; 6. the relative congestion of the court dockets and prospects for earlier trial; and 7. in a diversity case, the relative familiarity of the courts with the state law supplying the applicable rules of decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.