Johnson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2006
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 170 · 26 U.S.C. § 6213 · 26 U.S.C. § 6682 · 26 U.S.C. § 7421 · 26 U.S.C. § 7422 · 26 U.S.C. § 7602 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Haines v. Kerner · Imbler v. Pachtman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“even if [plaintiff] could establish that the government had no possible chance of succeeding on the merits, injunctive relief would still be prohibited unless [plaintiff] established that equity jurisdiction exists, i.e., that the court’s failure to issue an injunction order enjoining the collection or assessment of taxes will cause irreparable harm for which he has no adequate remedy at law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.