Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 F. Supp. 2d 449 - BOMASUTO v. Perlman

680 F. Supp. 2d 449 - BOMASUTO v. Perlman’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
May 2011
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Spencer v. Kemna · Carafas v. J · Jones v. Cunningham · North Carolina v. Rice

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.