Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 N.W.2d 89 - Hooper v. State

Hooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Larrison v. United States · Uselman v. Uselman · State v. Caldwell · United States v. Mitrione · In Re Jonathan Cooper and Steven Lynn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1)' the evidence was not known to the defendant or counsel at trial; (2) the failure to learn of the evidence before trial was not due to a lack of diligence; (3) the evidence is material, not merely impeaching, cumulative, or doubtful; and (4) the evidence will probably result in either an acquittal or a more favorable result for the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.