Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 P2D 1352 - Campbell v. Shankle

Campbell v. Shankle’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2020

1 district · 6 state decisions

3019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 34 Colo. App. 343 - Denver Symphony Ass'n v. Industrial Commission · 38 Colo. App. 90 - Peck v. Taylor · Clint v. Stolworthy Ex Rel. Greenwood · Howlett v. Greenberg · Whitley v. Georgia Western & Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All damages accruing under section 13-21-202 shall be sued for and recovered by the same parties and in the same manner as provided in section 13-21-201, and in every such action the jury may give such damages as they may deem fair and just ... to the surviving parties who may be entitled to sue_” (emphasis added)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “had the concomitant right to settle the claim and to receive the proceeds therefrom”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.