Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 680 P2D 29 - Colman v. Schwendiman

Colman v. Schwendiman’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1989
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wilcox v. Billings · 14 Utah 2d 238 - McKnight v. State Land Board · 33 Or. App. 397 - Blackburn v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, DEPT. · 44 Mich. App. 390 - Dawson v. Secretary of State · 85 Wash. 2d 769 - State v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the person has been placed under arrest and has thereafter been requested by a peace officer to submit to any one or more of the chemical tests provided for in subsection (1) of this section and refuses to submit to the chemical test or tests, the person shall be warned by a peace officer requesting the test or tests that a refusal to submit to the test or tests can result in revocation of his license to operate a motor vehicle. Following this warning, unless the person immediately requests the chemical test or tests as offered by a peace officer be administered, no test shall be given and a peace officer shall submit a sworn report, within five days after the date of the arrest, that he had grounds to believe the arrested person had been driving or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while having a blood alcohol content statutorily prohibited or while under the influence of alcohol or any drug or combination of alcohol and any drug as detailed in section 41-6-44 and that the person had refused to submit to a chemical test or tests as set forth in subsection (1) of this section. Within 20 days after receiving a sworn report from the peace officer to the effect that the person had refused a chemical test or tests the department shall notify the person of a hearing before the department.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.