Meyer v. Ludvik’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2000
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lawrence v. . Fox · Sabo v. Delman · Adams v. . Gillig · Johnson v. Soulis · Bissett v. Ply-Gem Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] promise or a statement of one's intention to act in the future, without more, cannot form the basis for an action in fraud”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“promise is made with the intention of not performing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.